Home » A New Concept of the Universe » INADEQUACY AND FALLACY OF NEWTON’S THREE LAWS AND ONE HYPOTHESIS

INADEQUACY AND FALLACY OF NEWTON’S THREE LAWS AND ONE HYPOTHESIS

INADEQUACY AND FALLACY OF NEWTON’S THREE LAWS AND ONE HYPOTHESIS
The Newton laws and hypothesis seemed to be a master statement of Nature’s underlying principles. They have held their prestige with reverence for their validity for three hundred years, during which time the misconception that all matter attracts all other matter with mathematically measurable power has been a fundamental of scientific thinking.
New enlightenment as to God’s ways and processes will demonstrate that this belief is but one more of the many seemingly obvious facts of Nature which deceive the senses into forming wrong conclusions. The senses of man have too readily accepted these simulations of facts for real facts.
Newton’s first law says: “Every body tends to continue in its state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line unless it is acted upon by an outside force”.

This law was written to fit non-existent premises which were mistakenly presumed to exist. A body cannot continue its state of rest because bodies at rest do not exist in Nature. Bodies are but waves of motion. When motion ceases, bodies cease to be. One might as appropriately refer to sound being at rest in silence, for sound is matter-in-motion like all other bodies.
A body cannot continue its uniform motion in a straight line in this radial universe of curved pressure gradients. Such a phenomenon is impossible. Likewise, all bodies are continually being acted upon by two outside, opposed forces–not one intermittent force.
Every body in the universe is constantly in violent motion, even though it simulates rest. When motion ceases matter ceases. A cloud floating motionlessly above the earth is moving at a speed of a thousand miles per hour as the earth rotates. It is also moving violently in all of its parts.
It is also moving in a curved line of direction, not a straight line, even though the force acting upon it is unchanging.
The same thing may be said of airplanes, planets, moons or radio waves. They all follow the curvature of gravity pressure gradients because gravity is always curved.
Even the lead pencil lying motionlessly upon a table cannot simulate rest except through motion so violent that your entire house would be instantly destroyed if the dual forces which cause that motion suddenly withdrew their support of it.
I herewith offer the following laws which have meaning in Nature to replace this meaningless first law:
1. All motion in this polarized, radial universe is curved, and all curvature is spiral.
2. Every body is the result of the exertion of two opposing strains which thrust away from each other in opposite radial directions to condition its attributes and determine its motion.
3. Every body is perpetually in motion until the strains of opposition which keep it in motion void each other in the universal zero of rest, into which all bodies disappear for reappearance in reversed polarity.
Newton’s third law says: “To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction”.
This law is inadequate and incomplete, for it confuses the facts which govern motion. Just what does it mean? Had it been written in either of the two following ways the confusion as to its meaning would disappear, but either one would still be incomplete.
(1) To every action there is an equal and opposite simultaneous reaction, or
(2) To every action there is an equal and opposite sequential reaction.
The inference is that the latter meaning was Newton’s intent.
To rewrite this law in conformity with Nature’s processes, Newton’s third law should read as follows:
“Every action is simultaneously balanced by an equal and opposite reaction, and is repeated sequentially in reversed polarity”.
That the above may be better understood by the scientist whose traditional training has fixed within his Consciousness the one-way-universe concept, it would be well for me to give a few familiar examples of the fundamental principle of the two-way concept which operates in every action-reaction effect of motion without exception anywhere.
1. An outward explosion compresses in advance of the direction of the action and simultaneously evacuates in the opposite direction. The following half of the cycle is in reverse. The evacuated condition becomes a compressed one, and the compressed condition becomes an evacuated one.
No better example of polarity than the above could be cited. All electric division of the indivisible equilibrium into pairs of opposite conditions takes place in this manner
–and the only two conditions in the universe are the compressed-plus and the expanded-minus conditions, and their resultant effects of heat and cold–male and female–positive and negative, and other wave vibrating pairs of opposites.
2. The discharge of a revolver and its recoil are simultaneous. The sequential reaction is in reverse. That which was a discharge becomes a charge–and their directions are reversed. That which was evacuated becomes a force of gravity which compresses at its center instead of around its circumference . The concavity of outward pressures reverses to the convexity of inward pressures.
Curvature of every simultaneous action-reaction is the reverse of the sequential one.

3. The discharge of every outbreathing body, whether man, or sun, or electron, charges space by compressing it. and simultaneously discharges the body by expanding it. The sequential action-reaction of inbreathing reverses this process.
Likewise, evacuating bodies simultaneously compress, and compressing space simultaneously expands its wave-field boundaries to balance each opposite with the other.
Every outward action is an explosion which forms rings of compression at its equator. These surround a large volume of expanded space. The sequential inward reaction of this action forms a center of gravity within the expanded volume as a nucleus for a forming sphere. Every sphere thus formed “explodes” radially to form rings of compression at its equator which again become sphere systems.
These are the fundamentals of the constitution of matter.
This underlying process of Nature is present in its every action-reaction. It is the very mechanics of the universal inbreathing-outbreathing process of Nature which motivates the heartbeat of the universe. It is the inside-out, outside-in turnings of space and matter which swallow each other up to born each other sequentially. This process is Nature’s most conspicuous fundamental. Repetition in Nature is due to this process.
4. Every growing thing which unfolds from the invisible pattern of its seed into visible form simultaneously refolds within its seed as an invisible record of the pattern of the unfolding form. The sequential reaction reverses the inward refolding direction and repeats the outward unfolding direction of growth.

Newton’s hypothesis states as follows: “Every particle of matter in the universe attracts every other particle with a force that varies directly as the product of the masses and inversely as the square of the distance”.
Science states that Newton’s mathematics prove without question that matter attracts matter. This is not true. Mathematics may prove the measures and relationships of a mirage, but they do not prove that the railroad tracks do meet there.
Likewise, Newton’s mathematics may prove the rates of acceleration and deceleration of the opposing pressures of gravity and radiation, as masses move toward and recede from each other in their eagerness to find rest from strains and tensions of unbalance, hut that does not prove that matter attracts matter. It only proves that matter seems to attract matter, just as railroad tracks seem to meet upon the horizon.
It would be just as logical to assert that planets were attracted by their perihelia because it could be mathematically proven that all planets increase their speed as they approach their perihelia.
For Newton’s third law to be valid, it must apply to all motion such as the orbits of planets as well as to falling bodies such as the apple, which is claimed to fall because it is attracted to the earth. It must have no exceptions, and it has many. Let us consider one of them.
When the apple falls toward a center of gravity, Newton adds up the product of the two masses–apple and earth–and mathematically accounts for the rate of acceleration as the two “mutually attracting” bodies approach each other.
When a planet approaches its perihelion, however, its speed increases just as the speed of the falling apple increases. Unlike the apple which is approaching another body, however, the planet is but approaching an empty point in space where there is no other body to add to that of the planet, such as there is when planet and apple potentials can be totalled.
The planet accelerates, however, without having another body to “attract it” Why has not this most obvious fact been observed long ago?

ASperihe
Let us look at this law from another point of view. Science has founded its cosmogenetic theory upon its belief that this is a one-way, discontinuous, non-compensating universe, in spite of the very obviously continuous, compensating two-way universe manifested in all of its effects, without one single exception in all Nature.
Whenever Nature projects any wave lever from its still fulcrum, she projects it two opposite ways–simultaneously–then reverses both by withdrawing both lever extensions back into their fulcrum. This fulfills her invariable law which decrees that all motion is born from rest, seeks two opposing points of maturity to rest, then returns as death to the zero of its beginning for rebirth.
Misconceptions of Weight
All freely floating bodies which are in balance with their environment have no weight whatsoever.

The moment any potential is taken out of an environment of equal potential, electric strains and tensions are set up in the unbalanced mass thus removed which measure the resistance to that removal.
A stone, for example, is very much out of balance with an equal volume of air. The stone will fall to seek a like potential, not because it has weight as a property of itself but because of the strains of electric polarity which divide the universal balance into equal-and-opposite unbalanced pairs, and insist upon keeping the universe in balance.
Science believes that a man who weighs 150 pounds while surrounded by air still weights 150 pounds when surrounded by the entirely different pressures of water in which he floats. That is not a true concept.
When a man is surrounded by air, he is out of balance with polarity which divides pressures equally. Electric tensions then act as elastic bands which are sufficiently stretched to register a strain of 150 pounds “pull” against the zero of his balance. When he is surrounded by water, however, the pressures of displacement and replacement are equalized. Each is in balance with the other and weight disappears.
If weight were a fixed attribute of matter, it would be unchangeable. It varies, however, as the potentials of masses out of balance vary. A man weighs less as he ascends a mountain, and more in a deep pit. As water falls, it compresses and gains in potential. As it rises, it divides into vapors and loses potential. It, therefore, weighs less. When its potential is equal in volume to the volume of potential displaced, it floats as a cloud. It then has no weight.
And so it is with stars, suns, planets and moons. They are all freely floating bodies and have no weight in respect to any other body in the universe.
Each solid centers an oppositely polarized volume of space in a wave field in which each polarized condition is of equal potential but of unequal volume. Every balanced wave field is insulated from every other wave field by reversals of curvature, which are separately considered in later pages.
The following definitions of weight will help to clarify the present misconception regarding it.
1. Weight is the measure of unbalance between the two electric forces which polarize the universal equilibrium.
2. Weight is the sum of the difference between the two pressures which act on every mass.
3. Weight is the sum of the difference in electric potential between any mass and the volume it occupies.
4. Weight is the measure of the force which a body exerts in seeking its true potential.
5. Weight is the sum of the difference between the inward thrust of gravitation and the outward thrust of radiation.
Regarding “Initial Impulse”
The movement of planets around their suns, and of moons around their planets, has always been an unexplained mystery. In ancient days, even up to the 16th century, it was commonly believed that angels pushed the planets around in their orbits.
It is today quite commonly believed that at the time of the creation of this universe, an initial impulse was given to each planet and moon which was just sufficient to keep each one forever moving around its primary.
The slightest understanding of the nature of the electric current, and its mechanical process of dividing one condition of eternal balance into two opposed conditions of unbalance, would dissipate such a belief.
There are countless billions of suns, earths and moons in the heavens. It could not just “happen” that each of these has just the right initial velocity to keep it in its orbit as a result of the primal cataclysm which is credited with the birth of the universe. That would be too great a cosmic coincidence for acceptance by any reasoning person.
Also such a theory would not bear the weight of so great a disturbing factor of this belief as the fact that no speed of any solar body is constant, as it would have to be to give substance to such a claim. Every solar body is forever, and constantly, varying its speed around its primary.
It varies it in each revolution by going faster for one half, and slower for the other half. It also varies it over its millions of years of motion by gradually slowing its speed of revolution and increasing its speed of rotation as it spirals away from its primary. During these periods, not one of the billions of solar bodies ever goes fast enough to fly off at a tangent from its primary, nor slow enough to fall into it, which in any case could not happen regardless of speed.
In addition to the foregoing is the fact that there never has been a primal cataclysm which created the universe. Electricity does not work that way, and there is no other working force in this universe than the dual electric force.
Electricity expresses its dividing powers equally–and simultaneously. Electricity then grows her effects to maturity and takes them apart to repeat them sequentially.
Also there have been millions of generations of suns, just as there have been millions of generations of men. If the initial impulse theory has any merit, that merit would not apply to descendants ten times ten billion generations removed.
Our moon is not one minute old in cosmic time. It could, therefore, have no “initial impulse”.
This is a radial universe and every center of gravity in every solar body is the apex of a conic section. Every satellite of every such body is a radial projection from the equator of its primary.
It first appears as a ring thrown off centrifugally from its parent’s equator. The ring becomes a sphere which centers its own wave field within its “ancestor” wave fields, then continues its outward spiral journey for millions of years of ever-slowing speed and ever-changing potential to keep in balance with the ever-changing potential of its wave field.
Our solar system is a good example. Consider Mercury as the latest extension of our sun. It is a very hot and very compressed planet which speeds around its primary in less than three months. When Mercury spirals out to where our earth is, it will take four times as long to make one revolution and it will he about four times as large in volume, for it must gradually expand to keep in balance with the ever-changing equipotential layers of the pressure gradient which reaches out from the sun into space.
When Mercury attains the position of Jupiter, it will be many limes larger and its period of revolution will be many years. Also its period of rotation will speed up as its period of revolution slows down, in order that centripetal and centrifugal effects of polarization will keep their balance with each other.

mars-1877

Likewise, the inner moon of Mars circles its primary every seven hours, while the outer moon takes thirty hours.

 

 

 

 

fig4-01All orbits are elliptical for they are angular conic sections. Likewise, all are either centripetal or centrifugal spirals, because their paths are either in the direction of the apex or the base of a cone.
Contradiction in the centripetal direction accounts for increase of speed as planets approach their perihelia, and expansion in the direction of a conical base accounts for decrease in speed of revolution of outer planets, and also for decrease in speed as planets approach their aphelia.
In view of all such very orderly periodicities and processes in the formation of material systems, it seems incredible that a formula such as Newton’s hypothesis ever should be thought of as proof that matter attracts matter, or that “initial impulse” accounted for the speed of planetary revolution.
The Two Ways of Life and Death
Nature projects—or extends—its wave lever for one-half of its cycle to manifest the life and growth principle. That is the process of polarization. Polarization vitalizes bodies by dividing their zero condition of rest and extending the divided pairs away from their zero equator as far as they can go. Polarization thrusts inwardly in centripetal spirals. It contracts to create gravity.
Nature then withdraws its wave lever into its zero source to manifest the death-and-decay principle during the other half of every cycle. That is the process of depolarization.

Depolarization devitalizes bodies by voiding the desire of the divided conditions to oppose each other. It relaxes the strains and tensions of electric opposition. Depolarization thrusts outwardly in centrifugal spirals. It expands to radiate every generated body back into the zero of its source in order that death may reverse its manifestation and reappear as life.
Matter appears when polarization divides an equilibrium zero into two zeros of opposite polarity. Matter then disappears when the divided and opposed poles unite to rest in the eternal one zero of the still Light from which all things appear, and into which they disappear for the purpose of reappearing in eternal sequences.

What Are life And Death?
That which man calls life in bodies is accelerative motion only–the centripetal motion of interchanging wave vibrations between two poles which have been extended from the ONE of their source. It is the accelerative motion of centripetal force which generates and contracts.

Science has long been searching for the life principle in some germ of matter. It may as well cast nets into the sea to search for oxygen.
That which is called death is just the opposite half of the whole life cycle. It is the decelerative motion of centrifugal force which degenerates, decays and expands.
Even though all bodies are both living and dying in each breath sequence of their whole cycle, the generative force of polarization is stronger in the first half of the cycle.

Conversely, all dying bodies are living while they die, but the degenerative force of depolarization which devitalizes is the stronger in the second half.
Life is eternal. There is no death. Life is but simulated in matter by polarization-depolarization sequences as all idea of Mind is but simulated in thought-waves of moving matter.
We Now Return to Newton’s One-Way Laws And One-Way Mathematics
Newton’s one-way laws and hypothesis account for falling bodies which are within the same wave field, and as a consequence have weight in respect to their common centers of gravity. Falling bodies are polarizing bodies. They gain weight as they fall.
Newton’s laws do not account, however, for rising bodies which have reversed their polarities and lose weight as they rise.
Neither do they account for floating bodies, such as suns, planets of moons, which center their own wave fields, and as a consequence have no weight in respect to any other body in the universe.
Apples do expand into gases, however, and rise. And liquids do expand into vapors and rise. Cycles do not end in gravity. That is but their halfway point where they simultaneously reverse their every attribute.
They reverse their directions, their potentials, their polarities, their densities, their spectrum colors and their weight. One attribute cannot be reversed without reversing all. The polarizing direction of gravity multiplies the power of all expressions of force while the depolarizing direction of radiation divides them all in equal but opposite ratios.
The attribute of attraction which Newton gives to falling bodies exploding inward toward gravity should also apply to rising bodies exploding outward toward expanded space. To apply that truth we would have to say: Every particle of matter in the universe repels every other particle with a force which varies inversely as the product of the masses and directly as the square of the distance.
Can it be true, that every particle of matter attracts every other particle of matter in the universe and also repels every other particle? How can either or both be true when each denies the truth of the other?
Matter neither attracts nor repels matter. Matter moves in two opposite directions for the sole purpose of simulating IDEA in formed bodies by dynamic action-reaction sequences, and then seeks rest in the Light of IDEA to reawaken desire for again simulating IDEA.

All motion is unbalanced. All motion is forever seeking rest from its unbalanced condition by seeking voidance of its motion.

Leave a comment